Are you ready to hear about Interoperability?

I recently came across a simple yet elegant explanation of how the Europeans institute interoperability. They used a creative metaphor that shows just how when everyone works together beautiful music can be made.

The premise of interoperability is that separate systems can function to their mutual benefit without losing their individual characteristics.

Your use of strategies to implement interoperable systems can show the same benefits to your organization.

Here is a rundown of what Europeans have known for years:

Individual standards or systems develop over time to protect organizational assets develop rules about how they interface with other systems, usually require translation of the differences or the compromise of one system to another. The result is dissonance.

Merging two or more systems results in the individual and valuable characteristics of one system being drowned out by the larger or more dominant system. The result is a single integrated system which no longer serves the needs of the individual participants.

A system that consist of interoperable parts, each of which can sustain itself, means that the benefits for both can be harmonized to support each system as well as creating a new and more effective whole. The trick is a coherent set of rules or standards or guidance that can only come from having a common script.

When we hear the expression “everybody” singing from the same song sheet it reminds of exactly how interoperability works. Each musician contributes to the whole and when on their own is still a viable soloist.

Here are three simple elements of interoperability that you can examine in your own organization:

  • A common language: Just as the musicians in an orchestra have a musical score which tells them what notes to play, at what tempo and with what feeling, interoperable systems have set of standard tools that describe how the work will be done.

  • A conductor: A conductor may seem to be in control of the orchestra, but musicians may tell you, that he or she is the guide and only occasionally the judge. In an interoperable system this is the assurance that there is an agreement for how to resolve disputes, and which provides guidance for all.

  • • An agreement to respect boundaries: Just as in an orchestra, the players only play what is on their page. In fact, they can only see their parts. The trumpets do not try to play the parts of the violins and the timpani do not try to play flute parts. In an interoperable system, the individual parts respect their roles and rely upon the common guidance or standards to guide their efforts to produce the best sound.

A truly outstanding musical work is greater than the sum of its parts because the parts all operate coherently following standards, a score and with a respect for their colleagues. I was gratified to see interoperability so well expressed by the Europeans in such a simple and yet elegant format. Let the music play in your organization and see how much better everything sounds in harmony.

Get ready to take advantage of the best in interoperability. You may surprise yourself by the music you (and your team) can make.

Transportation of Dangerous Goods

I followed with great interest the most recent derailment of a Canadian National train just outside of Gainford, Alberta which evidently had a number of liquid petroleum gas as well as crude oil containers as part of the consist. From preliminary reports, the train was travelling at 35 km/h on its way to Vancouver. There are no reports of non-compliance with the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act. It recalled a similar derailment in 1979.

Because of the increased interest in railway safety following Lac Mégantic, whenever a railway derailment occurs we all now pay close attention to its causes and effects.

The law respecting Dangerous Goods in Canada, dates back to just after a very similar event in Mississauga where cars containing benzene and chlorine ruptured and fortunately burned off the poisonous gases before drifting in a deadly cloud across metropolitan Toronto. No one died in Gainsborough and no one died in Mississauga, but there could have been deaths. In Lac Mégantic there were deaths.

Accidents happen and their effects must be as effectively and efficiently mitigated as possible. At the time of the Mississauga train derailment, the Dangerous Goods legislation was undeveloped and with the collaborative efforts of all parties lead by Transport Canada, a new law (the federal Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act) was proclaimed based on the best scientific evidence and technical data available at the time.

Accidents still happen. The underlying principle of the law remains the promotion of the safe transportation of dangerous goods.

What has changed is the quantity of certain substances being carried by railways. As the law was changed in 1985, 1992, and 2012, to reflect different standards and risks, so too should we take into account the changing nature of the community being regulated and the products being carried.

If there are different risk profiles associated with different dangerous goods, such as the magnitude of the consequences or the frequency of the risk to the community, then these could usefully be reconsidered in the next set of regulations. While accidents may still happen, well written regulations will help ensure the consequences are as limited as possible.

Learn more »